ECG Rhythm Analysis During Manual Chest Compressions Using an Artefact Removal Filter and Random Forest Classifiers

Iraia Isasi1, Ali Bahrami Rad2, Unai Irusta1, Morteza Zabihi3, Elisabete Aramendi1, Trygve Eftestøl4, Jo Kramer-Johansen5, Lars Wik6
1UPV/EHU, 2Aalto University, 3University of Technology, 4University of Stavanger, 5Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 6Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital


Abstract

Introduction: Chest compression (CC) artifacts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) make ECG rhythm diagnosis during CPR unreliable in current defibrillators. Aim: To develop a reliable shock advice algorithm (SAA) for use during manual CCs to minimize interruptions in CPR. Materials: Data from three emergency services were used (London, Stockholm and Akershus), comprising 273 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. 2203 ECG segments recorded during CPR were extracted and labeled as shockable (506) or non-shockable (1697). Methods: CPR artifacts were removed using a recursive least-squares (RLS) filter. Two filter configurations were tested, fine (λ1=0.987) and coarse (λ2=0.998) filtering. For each filtered ECG over 200 shock/no-shock decision features were computed and fed into a random forest (RF) classifier. For each classifier the best 25 features were selected through out-of-bag error ranking procedure. The results of the two RF-classifiers were further combined using a meta-classifier. 10-fold cross-validation was used for model assessment, and statistical distributions of sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were obtained replicating the process 100 times. Results were compared to a state-of-the art multistage method (MSA) that uses two RLS-filters (λ1 and λ2) and the SAA of a commercial defibrillator in three decision stages. Results: The mean (95% confidence interval) Se and Sp of the proposed algorithm were 93.5% (92.9-94.1) and 96.5% (96.2-96.7), respectively. The Se and Sp of the state-of-the art MSA solution were 91.7% and 93.7%, far below those obtained using the meta-classifier. Moreover, the proposed algorithm meets the minimum 90% Se and 95% Sp performance goals recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA). Conclusions: An AHA compliant method for rhythm analysis during manual CCs has been developed which considerably improves the performance of currently available methods.